- Calls to this hotline are currently being directed to Within Health or Timberline Knolls
- Representatives are standing by 24/7 to help answer your questions
- All calls are confidential and HIPAA compliant
- There is no obligation or cost to call
- Eating Disorder Hope does not receive any commissions or fees dependent upon which provider you select
- Additional treatment providers are located on our directory or samhsa.gov
Contributor: Kelly Bhatnagar, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist, Site Director & Research Director at The Emily Program – Cleveland, Certified Family-Based Treatment Therapist, The Training Institute for Child & Adolescent Eating Disorders
Fear. Guilt. Sadness. Confusion. Shame. The list could go on to describe the myriad of emotions parents go through when hearing for the first time that their child has been diagnosed with an eating disorder.
In their efforts to make sense of this information, many parents describe countless hours of ruminating over what they (the parents) could have done differently to prevent this from happening.
These emotions and beliefs can be reinforced by physicians and mental health professionals who advocate for treatment models that prohibit or significantly limit the involvement of family in the recovery process.
The Complexity of Family’s Role in Adolescent Eating Disorder Treatment
Despite data to suggest:
a) eating disorders develop in a wide range of family contexts and
b) there is no clear, identifiable family structure or pattern of family functioning associated with the onset of an eating disorder,
many clinicians still consider ‘family problems’ as part of the primary etiology and/or view participation of parents in treatment to be unnecessary or as interfering with the recovery process.
Undoubtedly, this view can contribute to parental self-blame and potentially disempower an ill child’s greatest advocates and allies for recovery.
The Potential for Family Support
As the role of family life in a child’s psychological and emotional development is widely recognized as being important, so is the potential value of including families in the treatment of children and adolescents with eating disorders.
A 2009 position paper released by Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Eating Disorders (F.E.A.S.T.), a parent advocacy group, highlights the need to provide clinical support to caregivers and families of sufferers of eating disorders. Specifically, F.E.A.S.T. calls on professionals treating eating disorder patients to:
- Allow the same family and caregiver access to patients as appropriate with any other medical illness.
- Learn about recent advances in treatment that emphasize family involvement.
- Include parents and other caregivers as an integral part of the treatment team.
- Communicate with the family in the same way as with any other medical illness.
The Maudsley Method
Fortunately, there is a model used in adolescent eating disorder treatment that attempts to integrate each of these recommendations into its very foundation. The Maudsley Method, also known as Family-Based Treatment or “FBT,” directly opposes the idea that families should be blamed for the development of an eating disorder.
Instead, families are considered essential to successful treatment and powerful agents of change in the recovery process for children and adolescents. In its standard form, FBT is designed to be a brief yet intensive outpatient treatment.
Parents/caregivers are charged with the task of assuming a direct and active role in restoring their child’s health after suffering from an eating disorder. Siblings are called upon to be a system of unconditional support for the ill child, making treatment truly a family affair.
The Three Phases of FBT (Family-Based Treatment)
FBT for adolescent anorexia nervosa proceeds through three well-defined phases.
In Phase I, known as the weight restoration phase, the therapist assists parents to develop an individualized plan for restoring their child’s health.
Parents are encouraged to temporarily take control of food and activity in order to feed their child according to what he or she needs and not what the eating disorder is willing to eat. This is done by parents taking responsibility for selecting, preparing, serving and supervising meals and snacks.
Parents are also coached in techniques to encourage their adolescent to eat more than what he or she was initially prepared to, which serves the purposes of empowering parents to take charge of the illness and reducing the eating disorders grasp on family decision-making.
Phase II begins when there is evidence of steady weight gain, the adolescent’s acceptance of the need to relinquish control of food to parents, and a change in the general mood of the family (e.g. parents expressing relief at having taken charge).
The focus in Phase II is to assist the parents to return developmentally-appropriate control of eating back over the adolescent. Behavioral symptoms remain central in the discussions between the therapist and family, however, other general family relationship issues or difficulties as they relate to ongoing recovery can now be brought forward for review.
Phase III commences when the adolescent is at or near full weight restoration and self-starvation behaviors have subsided.
Treatment focus shifts to the impact the eating disorder has had on the establishment of a healthy adolescent identity and efforts are made to ensure an adolescent is developmentally back on track from a physical, psychological, emotional and social perspective.
Taking a Non-Critical Stance
Throughout this process, parents are encouraged to embrace a non-critical stance toward the adolescent, as FBT adheres to the belief that the child too is not to blame for the eating disorder behaviors because they are mostly outside of his or her control.
FBT advocates for a firm, yet empathic approach that creates a zero-tolerance environment for the eating disorder without being forceful.
Research Is Limited
At present, research exploring efficacious outpatient treatments for eating disorders, anorexia nervosa in particular, is considered limited. That said, recent published reports describing the treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa using the FBT model is encouraging.
Studies have reported approximately two-thirds of adolescent patients to be considered recovered at the end of FBT while 75-90% are fully weight restored at five-year follow-up.
Additionally, researchers have shown that most children and adolescents suffering from anorexia nervosa require no more than approximately 20 treatment sessions, which has important implications for assisting youth to swiftly return to their developmental trajectory.
Families Are The Help, Not the Hurt
So what does this all mean? Although families do not cause eating disorders, they can be the best possible resource in helping a loved one to recover. Enabling loved ones to have an active role in treatment can create a force field of support that even the strongest of illnesses may have trouble penetrating.
Empowered. Capable. Knowledgeable. Mobilized. Successful. This is the internal dialogue that families should be encouraged to adopt. After all, they hold the most potent medicine (aside from food) that anyone can bring to the table. Love.
- Le Grange, D., Lock, J., Loeb, K., & Nicholls, D. (2009). Academy for Eating Disorders Position Paper: The Role of the Family in Eating Disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 1- 5.
- Lock, J., & Le Grange, D. (2012a). Treatment manual for anorexia nervosa: A family-based approach: Guilford Press.
- Lock, J., & Le Grange, D. (2012b). Treatment manual for anorexia nervosa: A family-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY US: Guilford Press.
- Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Eating Disorders (2009). FEAST protests continued use of “parentectomy” in eating disorder treatment. http://www.feast-ed.org/Parentectomy_Statement.pdf
- Downs, K. and Blow, A. (2013). A substantive and methodological review of family-based treatment for eating disorders: the last 25 years of research. Journal of Family Therapy, (35)1, 3-28.
- Eisler, I., Dare, C., Russell, G. F. M., Szmukler, G. I., Le Grange, D., and E. Dodge. 1997. Family and individual therapy in anorexia nervosa: A five-year follow-up. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 1025-1030.
The opinions and views of our guest contributors are shared to provide a broad perspective of eating disorders. These are not necessarily the views of Eating Disorder Hope, but an effort to offer a discussion of various issues by different concerned individuals.
Last Updated & Reviewed By: Jacquelyn Ekern, MS, LPC on December 5th, 2014
Published on EatingDisorderHope.com